XFR-S Vs E63 AMG S: Ultimate Head-To-Head Comparison

High-performance luxury sedans represent the pinnacle of engineering, blending blistering speed with everyday usability. The Jaguar XFR-S and Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG S stand out as icons from their eras, pushing the boundaries of what four-door cars can achieve. This comparison dives deep into their powertrains, dynamics, comfort, and overall appeal to crown the superior machine.

Powertrain Showdown: Supercharged vs Naturally Aspirated Might

At the heart of these beasts lie extraordinary engines designed for dominance. The Jaguar XFR-S employs a **5.0-liter supercharged V8**, delivering 542 horsepower and substantial torque from low revs. This setup propels it from 0-60 mph in 4.4 seconds, with a top speed electronically limited to 186 mph. The supercharger ensures instant throttle response, making acceleration feel relentless even in higher gears.

Mercedes counters with its **6.2-liter naturally aspirated V8** in the E63 AMG S variant, tuned for 549 horsepower. It revs freely to high rpms, offering an exotic soundtrack and broad powerband. Official figures claim a 0-60 mph time around 4.0 seconds in some tests, edging out the Jaguar in straight-line sprints. The E63’s seven-speed automatic shifts with lightning precision, contributing to its quarter-mile prowess.

The Jaguar’s torque advantage at low revs makes it more tractable for daily driving, while the Mercedes thrives when pushed hard, screaming to its redline.

Chassis Dynamics: Handling and Ride Balance

Performance saloons must excel on twisty roads and highways alike. The XFR-S features adaptive dampers with a Dynamic mode that stiffens settings to curb body roll. However, tests reveal it has the softest ride among rivals, with noticeable lean in corners and less sharpness in transitions. Braking is strong, often shortest from 70 mph, but the pedal feels numb, requiring modulation for smooth stops.

The E63 AMG S shines in poise, with superior skidpad grip and lane-change agility. Its chassis remains composed over undulations, demanding less steering correction at high speeds. The Mercedes’ suspension strikes a better balance between compliance and responsiveness, making it the driver’s choice on spirited runs.

• XFR-S Strengths: Floaty comfort on smooth roads, quick gear changes.
• E63 Weaknesses: Firmer ride over bumps, though more planted.
• XFR-S Handling Notes: More body roll, but engaging engine note compensates.
• E63 Handling Notes: Precise steering, metal paddles for intuitive shifts.

In group tests, the Jaguar pulls ahead mid-range speeds despite lower power, showcasing efficient power delivery. Yet, the Mercedes’ overall chassis refinement gives it the edge in ultimate handling.

Interior Refinement and Luxury Features

Luxury defines these cars beyond speed. The XFR-S cabin impresses with leather and wood accents, offering supportive seats. However, plastic paddle shifters feel cheap compared to rivals, and rear space is adequate but not class-leading.

Mercedes elevates with higher-quality materials and a more modern dashboard. The E63’s seats provide better bolstering, and the COMAND system, while dated now, was intuitive. Both offer similar tech like navigation and premium audio, but the Benz feels more premium overall.

Performance on Track and Drag Strip

Straight-line battles favor the E63 slightly, with quarter-mile times around 12.5 seconds. The Jaguar matches closely at 4.3 seconds to 60 mph in some evaluations, surging past in the 100-150 mph roll.

On circuits, the Mercedes’ grip and stability prevail, though the Jaguar’s supercharger delivers addictive mid-range punch. Fuel economy lags in both—expect single-digit mpg under hard use—but the supercharged V8 sips less at cruise.

Pricing, Value, and Ownership Today

New, the XFR-S listed near £80,000, pricier than the standard XFR by £15,000. The E63 commanded similar premiums. Today, used examples offer bargains: XFR-S around $30,000-$50,000, E63 slightly higher due to desirability.

Reliability favors neither—both demand maintenance on supercharged/NA V8s. Parts availability remains good for these icons.

Real-World Driving Impressions

Daily usability highlights the Jaguar’s smoother low-speed manners, ideal for UK roads. The E63’s rev-happy nature suits open autobahns, with a thunderous exhaust. Both transform mundane commutes into thrills.

Pros and Cons Summary

Which One Wins?

The Mercedes E63 AMG S edges victory for its balanced dynamics and driver engagement. The Jaguar XFR-S excels in accessible power and comfort, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing GT cruising.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which is faster: XFR-S or E63 AMG S?

The E63 AMG S holds a slight edge in 0-60 and quarter-mile times, but the XFR-S surges mid-range.

Are these cars reliable?

Both require diligent maintenance; Jaguar’s supercharger and Mercedes’ V8 demand care, but well-maintained examples last.

What’s the top speed of each?

XFR-S: 186 mph limited; E63: up to 190 mph.

Which has better fuel economy?

Neither shines—XFR-S around 8 km/L combined; real-world similar.

Should I buy used today?

Yes, for enthusiasts; check service history thoroughly.