Used Mazda CX-3 (2015-2020) Review: Handling & Economy

The Mazda CX-3 from 2015 to 2020 delivers a compelling blend of sporty handling, efficient powertrains, and upscale interior quality in a compact crossover package. Built on the Mazda2 platform, it prioritizes driver engagement over outright practicality, making it ideal for enthusiasts seeking a used SUV that feels more like a premium hatchback.

Powertrain Options and Acceleration

Mazda equipped the CX-3 with SkyActiv technology across its engine lineup, emphasizing lightweight construction and high efficiency without turbochargers in most cases. The initial offerings included a 2.0-litre petrol engine in 118bhp and 148bhp variants, alongside 1.5-litre and later 1.8-litre diesel units.

The 1.8-litre diesel stands out for its balance of performance and economy, producing 113bhp and 270Nm of torque from low revs. This torque delivery enables brisk acceleration, with a 0-62mph time around 9.9 seconds, and it outperforms some turbocharged rivals in track tests. Paired with a precise six-speed manual, it offers smooth pulls in everyday scenarios, from city traffic to motorway overtaking.

Petrol buyers have the naturally aspirated 2.0-litre SkyActiv-G, which rewards revving up to 6,000rpm. The 118bhp version hits 0-60mph in about 9.0 seconds, proving quicker than peers like the Audi Q2 1.0 TFSI in group tests, though its peak torque arrives higher in the rev range, demanding more gear shifts. Both petrol outputs pair well with a six-speed automatic option, enhancing versatility.

Diesel models from 2018 introduced the 1.5-litre replacement for the earlier unit, maintaining strong real-world economy without the thirstier traits of larger Mazda diesels. Front-wheel drive is standard, but higher-output diesels and select petrols offer four-wheel drive for better traction.

This table summarizes key specs, highlighting the diesels’ torque advantage for relaxed cruising.

Handling Dynamics and Chassis Balance

Renowned for its class-leading handling, the CX-3 uses MacPherson struts upfront and a torsion beam rear, tuned for agility. The chassis grips eagerly in corners, with minimal body roll, encouraging confident lane changes and twisty-road fun.

Steering is quick and responsive, though some note it lacks ultimate feedback compared to pure hot hatches. The 2017 facelift added G-Vectoring Control, which subtly adjusts torque during turns to shift weight forward, enhancing stability and turn-in sharpness without electronic gimmicks.

Petrol models edge out diesels in sharpness due to lighter weight, but all variants excel on backroads. Videos from reviewers praise its Mazda2-derived platform for predictable responses, making it feel peppier than bulkier rivals.

• Cornering grip: Excellent front-end bite with progressive limits.
• Steering precision: Direct ratio suits urban maneuvering and highways.
• Chassis poise: Balanced for enthusiastic driving without harshness.

Ride Quality and Comfort Assessment

While not the plushest in class, the CX-3 absorbs bumps competently, especially on 16-inch wheels standard on base trims. Larger 18-inch alloys transmit more road imperfections, increasing noise on coarser surfaces.

Motorway refinement is strong, with low wind noise and composed high-speed stability. Diesel engines run smoother than expected thanks to low-friction designs, suppressing clatter effectively. Petrol units rev freely but can sound busy under load.

Country lanes pose no issue; the suspension irons out potholes while maintaining control. Compared to softer rivals like the Citroen C4 Cactus, it trades some compliance for engagement, suiting drivers who value feedback.

Fuel Efficiency and Ownership Costs

SkyActiv’s innovations shine in economy. The 1.5-litre diesel achieves around 55mpg in mixed driving, with the 1.8 close behind. Petrols manage near 40mpg, impressive for naturally aspirated units.

Low kerb weight around 1,370kg aids frugality and sprightliness. Running costs remain competitive, bolstered by Mazda’s reliability reputation. Used prices reflect premium positioning, but low depreciation post-initial drop makes them accessible.

For families or commuters, diesels minimize refueling stops, while petrols appeal for shorter trips with cleaner emissions profiles in modern tests.

Trim Recommendations for Driving Enthusiasts

Best for economy: 1.5 SkyActiv-D SE Nav – Efficient and well-equipped basics.

Best for fun: 2.0 SkyActiv-G GT Sport – Extra power, sportier setup.

Best equipped: 2.0 GT Sport Nav+ – Adds safety tech without ride penalties from big wheels.

Lower trims offer generous kit, avoiding the firmer ride of top-spec alloys.

Real-World Driving Impressions

Owners and testers highlight the CX-3’s joy in daily use: effortless around town, planted on freeways, and involving on B-roads. Its MX-5-shared petrol engine feels lively, never out of puff.

Drawbacks include rear-seat crampedness and modest boot space, prioritizing driving over hauling. Road noise intrudes more than silent cabins, but overall refinement punches above its size.

Competitor Comparison

Versus Hyundai Kona or Peugeot 2008, the CX-3 trails in space but leads in dynamics and quality. A triple test saw the 2008 edge it on ride, yet Mazda’s engagement won fans.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Mazda CX-3 fun to drive?

Yes, its sharp handling and responsive engines make it one of the most engaging compact SUVs.

Which engine is best for fuel economy?

The 1.5/1.8 diesels deliver up to 55mpg real-world.

How reliable is the used CX-3?

Mazda’s build quality ensures strong dependability, with low running costs.

Petrol or diesel for the CX-3?

Diesel for torque and mpg; petrol for smoothness and revvy fun.

Any common issues?

Minimal; watch for alloy wear on higher trims.