Skoda Enyaq Coupe vs Peugeot E-3008: EV SUV Showdown

The electric vehicle market is heating up with stylish SUVs like the Skoda Enyaq Coupe and Peugeot E-3008 vying for attention. These models blend aerodynamic designs with practical family features, but which one delivers the superior blend of power, efficiency, and everyday usability? This comprehensive comparison dives into their powertrains, real-world driving experiences, interior spaces, pricing, and long-term ownership factors to help you decide.

Powertrain and Performance Breakdown

Both vehicles rely on battery-electric powertrains, but their engineering philosophies differ significantly. The Peugeot E-3008 employs a front-mounted electric motor paired with a 73kWh battery, producing 207-212bhp and 345Nm of torque. This setup prioritizes efficiency, achieving a WLTP range of 326 miles and a 0-62mph sprint in 8.8 seconds.

In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq Coupe uses a rear-mounted motor with an 82kWh usable capacity (77kWh), delivering 282bhp and a robust 545Nm of torque. This results in a quicker 6.7-second 0-62mph time and a slightly longer official range of 353 miles. The rear-wheel-drive layout gives the Skoda a sportier feel, especially in acceleration.

Higher-performance variants like the Enyaq Coupe RS push boundaries further, with up to 340bhp and 5.5-second acceleration, though our focus remains on standard models.

Range, Efficiency, and Charging Capabilities

Efficiency is crucial for EV buyers. The Peugeot edges out with 3.9 miles/kWh in tests, translating to a real-world range of about 285 miles. Its 400-volt architecture supports 160kW DC fast charging, enabling a 20-80% top-up in around 20 minutes. An optional heat pump (£700) enhances cold-weather performance.

The Skoda matches closely at 3.8 miles/kWh and 293 miles real-world range, with 135kW charging (0-80% in 29 minutes). Both include 11kW AC onboard chargers, but the Enyaq’s larger battery suits longer journeys better.

• Peugeot advantages: Superior efficiency and faster peak charging.
• Skoda advantages: Bigger battery for extended range.

In highway tests, the Enyaq averaged 16.4kWh/100km over 1800km, yielding around 470km per charge, competitive but not class-leading.

Driving Dynamics: Ride, Handling, and Refinement

On urban roads, the Skoda shines with superior bump absorption, gliding over potholes and drain covers that unsettle the Peugeot. Its suspension strikes a balance—composed without excessive float.

Highway cruising favors the Peugeot’s precise steering and stability, though the Skoda’s stronger brakes and smoother regen-to-friction transition provide confidence. Acceleration feels punchier in the Enyaq due to its power advantage and responsive throttle, despite longer pedal travel for modulation.

Handling-wise, the rear-drive Skoda offers engaging dynamics, while the front-drive Peugeot prioritizes comfort. Neither excels in sporty cornering, but both suit family duties well.

Design and Aerodynamics: Style Meets Function

The Enyaq Coupe’s sloping roofline enhances aerodynamics and visual appeal, though it slightly compromises rear headroom. The Peugeot E-3008 boasts a sleek, modern aesthetic with sharp lines, positioning it as a stylish alternative to boxier SUVs.

Both prioritize low drag coefficients for better range, but the Coupe’s form factor gives it a sportier silhouette ideal for those wanting distinction.

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Peugeot’s cabin impresses with premium materials, a panoramic glass roof, and customizable i-Cockpit. However, the small central screen and fiddly climate controls frustrate. Rear space is generous, with good legroom for adults.

Skoda counters with a spacious, simply laid-out interior using quality plastics. Its 10-inch infotainment is intuitive, and features like physical buttons enhance usability. Boot space is ample (no frunk), and the Coupe retains family-friendly access.

• Seating: Both offer five seats with ISOFIX on outer rears; Skoda adds a third point.
• Infotainment: Skoda’s clearer interface vs Peugeot’s stylish but complex setup.

Pricing, Running Costs, and Ownership

Starting at £46,440 (Skoda) vs £49,650 (Peugeot), the Enyaq undercuts its rival, with as-tested prices of £49,850 vs £51,700. Both emit 0g/km CO2, qualifying for low BIK tax (2%). Warranties are similar (3 years/60k miles), but Skoda’s battery coverage extends to 8 years.

Insurance and efficiency favor the Peugeot slightly, but Skoda’s value wins overall.

Safety and Driver Assistance Features

The Enyaq earns a five-star NCAP rating (91% adult, 89% child protection), with standard AEB, lane-keep, and blind-spot monitoring. Peugeot’s tech suite matches, including 360-degree cameras, though adult/child scores are unrated yet.

Both provide front/rear sensors and multiple airbags (Peugeot: 6; Skoda: 7).

Real-World Test Insights

In mixed driving, the Skoda’s ride comfort and power make it the daily driver of choice. The Peugeot excels in efficiency and urban maneuverability but can’t match the Enyaq’s versatility. For performance enthusiasts, higher-output Enyaq RS variants close gaps with rivals like Tesla.

Pros and Cons Summary

• Peugeot E-3008:
  • Pros: Top efficiency, fast charging, premium interior.
  • Cons: Firmer ride, less power, higher price.
• Skoda Enyaq Coupe:
  • Pros: Strong acceleration, smooth ride, better value.
  • Cons: Slower charging, coupe roofline limits headroom.

Which One Should You Buy?

The Skoda Enyaq Coupe takes the crown for its balanced performance, comfort, and pricing—ideal for most buyers. Choose Peugeot if efficiency and style top your list. Both advance EV SUV standards.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which has the longer range?

Skoda Enyaq Coupe claims 353 miles WLTP vs Peugeot’s 326 miles, with real-world tests showing a slight Skoda edge.

Is the Enyaq faster?

Yes, 6.7s 0-62mph vs 8.8s, thanks to higher power and rear-drive.

Which is cheaper to buy?

Skoda starts lower at £46,440 vs £49,650.

Do they have heat pumps?

Peugeot offers it optionally (£700); Skoda includes in some trims.

Safety ratings?

Skoda: 5-star NCAP; Peugeot pending but equipped similarly.