Mazda CX-70 vs Honda Passport: Ultimate SUV Showdown

In the competitive world of midsize SUVs, the 2026 Mazda CX-70 and Honda Passport stand out as strong contenders for buyers seeking a blend of performance, comfort, and versatility. The Mazda impresses with its turbocharged power and premium features, while the Honda emphasizes rugged capability and cargo room. This in-depth comparison breaks down key aspects to help you decide which vehicle pulls ahead for your driving needs.

Overview of the Contenders

The Mazda CX-70 represents Mazda’s push into premium territory with refined engineering and driver-focused design. Built on an extended platform from the CX-90, it prioritizes sporty handling and upscale amenities. Meanwhile, the Honda Passport continues its legacy as a trail-ready SUV, updated with a smoother transmission and enhanced off-road trims like the TrailSport.

Both models target adventure enthusiasts and families, but they differ in philosophy: Mazda leans toward luxury and efficiency, Honda toward durability and space. Starting prices reflect this, with the CX-70 entering at around $43,780 and the Passport at $46,245.

Engine Performance and Drivetrain

Power is where the Mazda CX-70 flexes its muscles. Its standard 3.3-liter turbocharged inline-six engine delivers up to 340 horsepower and 369 lb-ft of torque in high-output form, surpassing the Honda Passport’s 3.5-liter V6 with 285 hp and 262 lb-ft. Even the base CX-70 tune offers 280 hp and 332 lb-ft, providing more low-end grunt for acceleration and towing.

The CX-70 pairs its engine with an 8-speed automatic transmission and standard all-wheel drive, including modes for sporty driving. The Passport uses a new 10-speed automatic, which reviewers note for smoothness, but its power output lags behind. Towing capacity is competitive on both, though Mazda’s trailer sway control adds confidence.

Mazda’s engine feels more responsive, especially in turbocharged pulls, making it ideal for highway merging and mountain roads.

Fuel Economy and Efficiency Options

Efficiency favors the Mazda CX-70, achieving 23 mpg city and 28 mpg highway compared to the Passport’s 19/25 mpg. Combined figures reach 25 mpg for Mazda versus 21 mpg for Honda in select trims. The CX-70 also offers a plug-in hybrid variant with 61 MPGe and 32 miles of electric range, a game-changer for eco-conscious buyers.

Honda’s TrailSport trim dips to 18 city/23 highway due to off-road tires, while Mazda maintains strong numbers across the board. For long trips, the CX-70’s edge translates to fewer fuel stops.

Interior Comfort and Passenger Space

Mazda’s cabin exudes premium quality with Nappa leather, heated/ventilated seats, and a heated steering wheel as standards. Passenger volume totals 141.6 cubic feet, with 39.7 inches front headroom, 41.7 inches front legroom, and generous rear space up to 39.4 inches legroom. Rear passengers enjoy USB-C ports and heated seats.

The Passport offers a functional interior with 119.1 cubic feet passenger volume, feeling more utilitarian. Both seat five comfortably, but Mazda’s design feels airier and more upscale.

• Mazda CX-70 Pros: Luxurious materials, superior legroom, advanced climate controls.
• Honda Passport Pros: Durable build, optional heated windshield.

Cargo Capacity and Practicality

Honda claims victory in cargo with 100.8 cubic feet maximum (seats folded) versus the CX-70’s slightly less behind the second row. Everyday use sees Passport edging out with more behind-row space, suiting gear-heavy trips.

However, Mazda counters with roof rails, 21-inch wheels (vs. Honda’s 18-inch), and 8.1 inches ground clearance for better versatility. Both handle groceries and sports equipment well, but Honda prioritizes volume over refinement.

Technology and Driver Assistance

Mazda loads up standard tech: wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, GPS navigation, 360-degree camera, head-up display, and in-vehicle Wi-Fi. Safety includes forward collision warning, automatic emergency braking, and blind-spot monitoring—many absent on base Passport.

Wireless charging and remote start are Mazda exclusives at entry level. Honda matches on basics like braking but requires upgrades for extras. Infotainment is intuitive on both, though Mazda’s feels more modern.

Off-Road Capability and Handling

The Passport shines off-road with TrailSport features like all-terrain tires and higher approach angles. Mazda’s double-wishbone suspension and AWD with sport mode deliver car-like handling on pavement, with adequate ground clearance for light trails.

Winter tests show both competent, but Mazda’s lower noise and stability stand out. For serious overlanding, Honda; for balanced driving, Mazda.

Pricing, Value, and Ownership Costs

At $43,780 base, the CX-70 undercuts the $46,245 Passport while packing more power and features. Mazda’s 3-year/36,000-mile warranty matches Honda’s, but premium touches suggest better resale.

Lower fuel costs and efficiency boost Mazda’s long-term value. Trim upgraders find Mazda’s standard suite reduces option spending.

Pros and Cons Summary

Mazda CX-70

• Pros: Potent turbo engine, excellent fuel economy, premium interior, loaded with tech.
• Cons: Less max cargo, higher-end trims pricey.

Honda Passport

• Pros: Superior cargo volume, proven reliability, strong off-road trims.
• Cons: Thirstier engine, fewer standard features, higher cost.

Who Should Buy Which?

Choose the Mazda CX-70 if you prioritize driving excitement, efficiency, and luxury on a budget. It’s perfect for daily commutes, family hauls, and spirited weekends. Opt for the Honda Passport if maximum cargo and rugged trails are key—ideal for campers and haulers.

Overall, the CX-70 offers better value for most buyers, blending performance and refinement. Test drive both to feel the difference.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which SUV has more horsepower: Mazda CX-70 or Honda Passport?

The Mazda CX-70 tops with up to 340 hp from its turbo I6, beating the Passport’s 285 hp V6.

Does the Mazda CX-70 get better gas mileage?

Yes, 23 city/28 highway mpg versus 19/25 for the Passport.

Is the CX-70 more spacious inside?

Mazda provides 141.6 cu ft passenger volume vs. Honda’s 119.1 cu ft.

What about cargo space?

Honda leads with 100.8 cu ft max vs. CX-70’s lesser capacity.

Which has more standard safety features?

Mazda includes remote start, wireless charging, and collision warning standard.