Jeep Avenger Vs Mazda MX-30: Which EV Suits You?

Electric vehicles are reshaping the small SUV market, with unconventional options like the Jeep Avenger and Mazda MX-30 standing out for their unique designs and driving experiences. The Avenger brings Jeep’s rugged heritage into a compact, efficient package, while the MX-30 emphasizes Mazda’s signature style with innovative features. This comparison dives into their specifications, performance, efficiency, practicality, and more to help buyers decide which left-field EV best suits urban adventures and daily commutes.

Design and Dimensions: Compact vs Commanding Presence

The Jeep Avenger measures just 4,084mm in length, making it one of the shortest in its class and comparable to a supermini like the VW Polo. Its boxy, muscular styling nods to Jeep’s off-road roots with squared-off wheel arches, bold grille, and seven-slot front fascia adapted for electric appeal. Despite sharing underpinnings with Stellantis siblings, unique details like angular headlights and rugged cladding give it distinct character.

In contrast, the Mazda MX-30 stretches to 4,395mm, dwarfing the Avenger with a longer wheelbase and taller stance. Mazda’s ‘Kodo’ design language shines through in its sleek lines, rear-hinged suicide doors for rear access, and recycled materials for an eco-conscious vibe. This makes the MX-30 feel more premium and spacious externally, though its size impacts maneuverability.

The Avenger’s smaller footprint excels in tight city parking, while the MX-30’s dimensions offer a more imposing road presence.

Powertrains and Performance: Power Meets Practicality

Both SUVs employ front-wheel-drive electric motors with single-speed automatics. The Avenger’s 154bhp unit delivers 260Nm of torque, achieving 0-62mph in 9.6 seconds and a top speed of 93mph. Real-world tests confirm smooth acceleration suitable for overtakes, aided by regenerative braking modes that approach one-pedal driving.

The MX-30 counters with 143bhp and a higher 271Nm torque figure, posting a near-identical 9.7-second sprint to 62mph but capping at 87mph. Its drive selector feels more traditional, providing precise control. While power outputs are close, the Avenger edges ahead in top speed and usability.

• Avenger strengths: Stronger peak power, better top speed, versatile regen modes.
• MX-30 strengths: Higher torque for low-speed punch, engaging throttle response.

Battery, Range, and Efficiency: The Range Decider

A key differentiator is battery capacity. The Avenger’s 54kWh (51kWh usable) pack yields a WLTP range of 246 miles, with test efficiency at 4.3 miles/kWh—impressive even on motorways. Real-world figures suggest 200+ miles reliably, thanks to low consumption of 15.4kWh/100km.

The MX-30’s smaller 35.5kWh battery limits WLTP to 124 miles, with tests showing just 124 miles at 3.6 miles/kWh. Its 18.5kWh/100km efficiency lags, making it better for short trips despite quick charging times.

For longer journeys, the Avenger dominates; the MX-30 suits city dwellers with home charging.

Charging Capabilities: Speed and Convenience

The Avenger supports up to 100kW DC fast charging (20-80% in 24 minutes) and 11kW AC (full charge in 5.5 hours). Base models get 7kW AC. This makes it versatile for public networks.

MX-30 offers 50kW DC (26 minutes 20-80%) and 6.6kW AC (5 hours). Its smaller battery charges faster absolutely but slower relatively.

Driving Experience: Ride, Handling, and Comfort

On urban roads, the Avenger’s softer suspension absorbs bumps better, despite 18-inch wheels. It’s composed at low speeds with light steering ideal for parking.

The MX-30 feels firmer, prioritizing body control for spirited B-road drives. It corners flatter with more feedback, appealing to enthusiasts, but ride harshness jars over potholes.

Motorway stability favors the MX-30’s stiffer setup, though wind noise is noticeable in both. The Avenger’s efficiency shines here.

Interior Quality and Practicality: Space and Storage

Avenger’s cabin blends Jeep toughness with Stellantis familiarity—robust materials, intuitive touchscreen, and physical buttons. Rear space is tight for adults, but boot offers 341-1,053 litres.

MX-30 impresses with premium fabrics, unique door design, and rotary dial. Rear legroom benefits from wheelbase, boot at 332-1,137 litres. Both seat four comfortably.

• Infotainment: Avenger’s 10.25-inch screen vs MX-30’s intuitive Mazda system.
• Safety: Both earn high marks; MX-30 has 5-star Euro NCAP.

Running Costs and Ownership: Value for Money

Priced at £39,600 (Summit), Avenger undercuts rivals with zero VED and strong residuals potential. Three-year warranty matches MX-30 (£35,550).

Lower purchase for MX-30, but range limits appeal. Efficiency costs more long-term.

Pros and Cons at a Glance

Which One Wins?

The Jeep Avenger takes the crown for most buyers, thanks to its unbeatable range, efficiency, and city-friendly size—ideal for real-world EV adoption. Mazda MX-30 appeals to style-focused drivers okay with frequent charging.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which has the better range: Jeep Avenger or Mazda MX-30?

Jeep Avenger offers up to 246 miles WLTP vs MX-30’s 124 miles.

Is the Jeep Avenger suitable for families?

It’s compact with adequate boot space but tighter rears; fine for small families.

How do charging times compare?

Avenger faster at 100kW DC; both similar AC times.

Which is more fun to drive?

MX-30 for twisty roads; Avenger for comfort.

What are the prices?

Avenger Summit £39,600; MX-30 Makoto £35,550.