The Fiat Panda 100HP and Nissan Note represent two distinct approaches to the compact car segment. The Panda delivers spirited driving fun with its peppy engine, while the Note prioritizes family-friendly space and reliability. This comparison draws on key specs to help buyers decide which suits their needs best.
Engine Power and Driving Dynamics
Performance defines the Fiat Panda 100HP’s appeal. Its tuned 1.0-liter engine produces around 100 horsepower, enabling a 0-60 mph sprint in under 10 seconds, significantly quicker than the Nissan Note’s 1.4-liter unit that takes 13.4 seconds. This makes the Panda ideal for those seeking excitement on twisty roads.
In contrast, the Nissan Note’s engine, often a 1.2- or 1.4-liter petrol, outputs 80-90 hp with 110 Nm torque, sufficient for city commuting but lacking the Panda’s zest. Acceleration for base Note models hovers at 13.7 seconds to 62 mph, trailing the Panda despite similar power outputs in standard variants.
| Aspect | Fiat Panda 100HP | Nissan Note |
|---|---|---|
| Power (hp) | ~100 | 80-90 |
| Torque (Nm) | ~145 | 110 |
| 0-62 mph (s) | <10 | 13.4-13.7 |
The Panda’s lighter weight and sportier tuning give it an edge in agility, with a tighter turning circle of 9.1 meters versus the Note’s 10.7 meters, enhancing urban maneuverability.
Fuel Efficiency and Running Costs
Fuel economy favors the Nissan Note. Official figures show the Note achieving 47.9 mpg combined with 139 g/km CO2 emissions, better than the Panda 100HP’s 43.5 mpg and 154 g/km. Real-world data confirms this: Note users report 5.8 l/100km versus Panda’s 6.1 l/100km.
With a larger 41-liter tank, the Note offers up to 870 km range in mixed driving, outpacing the Panda’s 720 km from its 35-liter tank. Annual savings could reach 15-45 liters for 15,000 km drivers, plus lower road tax for the Note.
- Note Advantage: Superior economy and range reduce long-term costs.
- Panda Trade-off: Thirstier engine reflects its performance focus.
Size, Space, and Practicality
The Nissan Note’s MPV roots shine in dimensions: 4.10 m long, 1.70 m wide, with 325 liters boot space expanding to 1,495 liters seats folded—far surpassing the Panda’s 3.53 m length and 206 liters trunk.
Sliding rear seats in the Note optimize legroom for families, while the Panda’s boxy design offers decent height (1.54 m) but cramped rear space. Gross weight is lower on the Panda (1,305 kg vs 1,510 kg), aiding handling.

Image: Side-by-side size illustration highlighting Note’s length advantage.
Build Quality and Reliability
Annual inspections reveal the Nissan Note’s edge in durability, with fewer defects than the Fiat Panda, rated average quality versus low. Engine lifespan favors the Note at 350,000 km over 330,000 km, thanks to reliable chains versus belts.
The Panda’s engine, produced longer (18 years) across models like Punto and 500, ensures parts availability. However, Notes suffer fewer issues overall.
Interior Comfort and Features
Entry-level Notes (Visia, ~£10,295) include air-con but basic steel wheels and manual windows, lacking sat-nav. Higher trims add connectivity. The Panda 100HP (~£10,395) offers sportier seats and dynamics but similar base spec.
Both seat five, but Note’s flexible seating wins for versatility.
Purchase Price and Value
Used prices: Panda ~€4,000, Note ~€5,200, reflecting size and features. The Note delivers better value for practicality seekers; Panda for driving enthusiasts.
Pros and Cons Overview
| Fiat Panda 100HP Pros | Fiat Panda 100HP Cons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Note Pros | Nissan Note Cons | ||
| Quicker acceleration | Less space | Larger boot, flexible seats | Slower performance |
| Better maneuverability | Higher fuel use | Superior economy | Larger turning circle |
| Fun to drive | Lower reliability | Higher quality rating | Higher price |
Ideal Buyer Profiles
- Choose Panda 100HP if: You crave sporty handling, city agility, and don’t need max space.
- Choose Nissan Note if: Family space, fuel savings, and reliability top your list.
Environmental Impact
Lower CO2 (139 g/km) positions the Note greener; Panda’s 154 g/km suits performance fans less eco-focused. Both petrol units align with urban low-emission zones.
Long-Term Ownership
Note’s chain-driven engine and quality edge promise lower maintenance. Panda’s belt needs periodic replacement but cheaper parts. Resale holds steadier for Nissans.
FAQs
Which is faster, Fiat Panda 100HP or Nissan Note?
The Panda 100HP accelerates quicker, under 10 seconds to 62 mph versus Note’s 13+ seconds.
Does the Nissan Note have more boot space?
Yes, 325 liters standard (expands to 1,495L) beats Panda’s 206L.
Which is more fuel-efficient?
Nissan Note, with 47.9 mpg official and better real-world figures.
Is the Fiat Panda easier to park?
Yes, smaller size and 9.1m turning circle aid tight spots.
What are typical used prices?
Panda ~€4,000; Note ~€5,200.
References
- Fiat Panda 2012 vs Nissan Note 2013 | Compare cars Auto ABC — Auto-ABC.eu. Accessed 2026. https://www.auto-abc.eu/compare/Fiat-Panda-v10265-vs-Nissan-Note-v8964
- Fiat Panda 100HP vs Nissan Note | Auto Express — Auto Express. 2010 (historical review). https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-reviews/38746/fiat-panda-100hp-vs-nissan-note
- Fiat Panda vs Nissan Note – CarGurus.co.uk — CarGurus. Accessed 2026. https://www.cargurus.co.uk/Cars/compare/Fiat-Panda-vs-Nissan-Note_d3119_d3755

