Luxury electric vehicles are transforming the executive car segment, offering silent propulsion, advanced tech, and impressive ranges. This head-to-head pits the Mercedes-Benz EQE against the Genesis Electrified G80, two saloons blending premium appeal with zero-emission powertrains. Both promise spacious cabins and long-distance capability, but which excels in real-world driving, efficiency, and overall value? We dive deep into specs, performance metrics, and dynamic tests to deliver a definitive verdict.
Powertrain and Performance Breakdown
The heart of any EV lies in its electric motors and battery setup. The Mercedes EQE 350+ features a single rear-mounted motor producing 288 horsepower and 565 Nm of torque. This rear-wheel-drive configuration delivers smooth acceleration, hitting 0-62 mph in 6.4 seconds during our evaluation. Its throttle mapping prioritizes refinement, with Comfort and Sport modes offering the best balance for everyday use, while Eco feels underpowered despite the output.
In contrast, the Genesis Electrified G80 employs a dual-motor all-wheel-drive system totaling 359 horsepower and 700 Nm. This setup propels it to 0-62 mph in a brisk 4.9 seconds, outpacing the EQE significantly. The extra grunt shines on straights, though front-wheel traction can occasionally falter under full throttle. Independent tests confirm the Genesis’s edge, clocking 60 mph in 4.1 seconds versus the EQE’s 5.2.
| Metric | Mercedes EQE 350+ | Genesis Electrified G80 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 288 hp / 565 Nm | 359 hp / 700 Nm |
| 0-62 mph | 6.4 sec | 4.9 sec |
| Drive | Rear-wheel | All-wheel |
| Curb Weight | ~5,488 lb | ~5,047 lb |
These figures highlight the Genesis’s performance advantage, making it the choice for enthusiasts seeking sharper responses without sacrificing luxury.
Battery, Range, and Real-World Efficiency
Battery capacity and aerodynamics define EV viability for long journeys. The EQE houses a 90.6 kWh pack, aiding its WLTP-rated 356-mile range, with a slippery 0.22 Cd drag coefficient optimizing airflow. In cold-weather testing, it achieved 3.0 miles per kWh, suggesting stronger summer performance. Highway range tests yielded 260 miles.
The Genesis counters with an 87.2 kWh battery and 0.27 Cd coefficient, claiming 323 miles WLTP. Remarkably, it matched the EQE’s 3.0 mi/kWh efficiency and outperformed in highway runs at 280 miles. EPA estimates favor the Genesis slightly at 100 MPGe combined versus the EQE’s projected figures.
- EQE Strengths: Larger battery, superior aerodynamics for potential range gains.
- Genesis Strengths: Proven real-world efficiency despite smaller pack.
Efficiency edges to Genesis in practical scenarios, challenging the notion that dedicated EV platforms always prevail over adapted ones.
Charging Capabilities and Practicality
Fast charging is crucial for EV adoption. The EQE’s 400-volt architecture supports up to 170 kW, taking longer for 10-80% top-ups compared to rivals. Genesis’s 800-volt system enables 240 kW peaks, achieving 10-80% in 21 minutes—about a third quicker. Real-world DC fast-charging averaged 135 kW for Genesis over 10-90%, completing in 32 minutes.
Both offer one-pedal driving: EQE via adaptive regen, Genesis with i-Pedal for seamless control. Warranty coverage is robust—Mercedes provides 10 years/155,000 miles on the battery, Genesis matching with strong terms.
Driving Dynamics: Handling and Ride Quality
Urban agility favors neither decisively; turning circles are nearly identical despite EQE’s four-wheel steering. On A- and B-roads, Genesis impresses with sharper steering feedback and composed handling, feeling more engaging than the EQE’s softer setup. The Mercedes prioritizes comfort with a plush ride, but its aloof steering and wooden brakes detract from involvement.
Genesis’s adaptive suspension balances sportiness and refinement, though it could smooth out harsher impacts. In skidpad tests, it gripped at 0.90 g, underlining its dynamic prowess. Braking from 100-0 mph measured 376 feet. Overall, Genesis delivers a more rewarding drive.
Design and Aerodynamic Efficiency
Mercedes’s EQE adopts a futuristic, blob-like silhouette optimized for air resistance, closely resembling the larger EQS. This purpose-built EV body contrasts with Genesis’s conventional G80 saloon shape, electrified without radical changes. While EQE’s aero edge (0.22 Cd vs 0.27 Cd) aids range, Genesis’s traditional proportions appeal more aesthetically.
Both are hefty, with EQE at 5,488 pounds and Genesis at 5,047—weight impacts agility but enables stable high-speed cruising.
Interior Comfort and Technology Features
Mercedes’s cabin dazzles with hyperscreen tech across multiple displays, offering intuitive controls and vast customization. Rear space is generous, though the fastback roofline slightly compromises headroom. Materials exude luxury, complemented by quiet operation.
Genesis matches with a 27-inch digital cockpit, premium leather, and massaging seats. Its interior feels upscale yet less screen-heavy, prioritizing physical switchgear for usability. Both provide ample legroom, but Genesis edges in perceived quality and driver focus.
| Feature | Mercedes EQE | Genesis Electrified G80 |
|---|---|---|
| Infotainment | Hyperscreen, multiple screens | 27-inch display |
| Seating | Comfort-focused, ventilated | Massaging, premium leather |
| Cabin Noise | Extremely quiet | Well-suppressed |
Pricing, Ownership, and Value Assessment
The EQE 350+ Exclusive Luxury starts at £86,345, with options pushing costs higher. Genesis offers stronger value, undercutting Mercedes while loaded with kit—avoiding pricey extras keeps it affordable. Running costs are low for both (zero VED), but Genesis’s superior performance and efficiency enhance appeal.
Three-year unlimited-mileage warranties underpin ownership, with Mercedes’s battery guarantee standing out.
Pros and Cons Summary
- Mercedes EQE Pros: Aero efficiency, tech-laden interior, smooth ride.
- Mercedes EQE Cons: Slower acceleration, higher price, less engaging handling.
- Genesis Pros: Quicker, better value, superior dynamics.
- Genesis Cons: Less slippery aero, firmer ride.
Final Verdict: Genesis Takes the Crown
The Genesis Electrified G80 emerges victorious, blending rapid performance, engaging drive, and competitive pricing. It outperforms the EQE across key metrics, proving an electrified luxury saloon can rival dedicated EV platforms. Mercedes offers refinement, but Genesis feels more special and versatile.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Which has the longer real-world range?
Genesis achieved 280 miles highway vs EQE’s 260, despite smaller battery.
Is the Genesis faster?
Yes, 4.9 sec 0-62 mph vs 6.4 sec, confirmed in multiple tests.
How do charging times compare?
Genesis’s 800V system charges 10-80% in 21 min vs EQE’s slower rate.
Which is better value?
Genesis undercuts EQE significantly while offering more power.
Are they comfortable for long trips?
Both excel, but EQE’s ride is plusher, Genesis more dynamic.
References
- Mercedes EQE vs Genesis Electrified G80: 2023 twin test review — Auto Express. 2023-04-29. https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-group-tests/360111/mercedes-eqe-vs-genesis-electrified-g80-2023-twin-test-review
- Tested: 2023 Genesis Electrified G80 vs. Mercedes-Benz EQE350 4Matic Compared — Car and Driver. 2023. https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a41573974/2023-genesis-electrified-g80-2023-mercedes-benz-eqe350-4matic-compared/

