CX-60 Vs NX Vs XC60: 3 Best Premium Mid-Size SUVs Compared

Premium mid-size SUVs continue to dominate the market by blending luxury, advanced powertrains, and versatile practicality. This comparison pits three standout contenders: the Mazda CX-60 e-Skyactiv PHEV Takumi, Lexus NX 450h+ Takumi, and Volvo XC60 Recharge T6 Dark Plus. Each brings unique strengths to the segment, from innovative hybrid systems to refined cabins, but only one emerges as the overall leader after rigorous testing on acceleration, efficiency, handling, comfort, and everyday usability.

Powertrain Innovations and Performance Breakdown

These vehicles represent the cutting edge of electrified propulsion, all featuring plug-in hybrid setups designed for short electric-only commutes and efficient long-haul travel. The Mazda CX-60 pairs a 2.5-liter four-cylinder petrol engine with a single electric motor, delivering a combined 323 horsepower. Its rear-biased all-wheel-drive system aims for sportier dynamics.

The Lexus NX 450h+ employs a self-charging hybrid configuration with a 2.5-liter engine and dual electric motors for 305 horsepower total. This setup excels in seamless transitions between electric and petrol modes, prioritizing smoothness. Volvo’s XC60 Recharge T6 uses a turbocharged 2.0-liter petrol engine boosted to 250 horsepower internally, augmented by an electric motor for 345 horsepower—the highest output here—and a rear-biased AWD layout.

Acceleration tests show the Volvo edging out with 5.7 seconds to 62mph, followed closely by Mazda at 5.8 seconds. The Lexus trails slightly at 6.3 seconds but feels more responsive in real-world overtaking due to its intuitive transmission. Volvo caps speed at 112mph for safety, while the Japanese duo reach 124mph.

Fuel Efficiency and Real-World Range

Electrified powertrains promise low running costs, but depleted batteries reveal true efficiency. With battery charged, all achieve impressive electric ranges around 39-43 miles. The Lexus NX shines brightest, posting 48.9mpg in mixed testing—ideal for daily drives. Mazda manages 42.3mpg, while Volvo drops to a disappointing 32.6mpg once the battery empties.

Over extended combustion-only journeys, these figures translate to significant savings. Annual fuel costs for 20,000 miles favor the Lexus at approximately £3,031, Mazda at £3,504, and Volvo at £4,546, based on period pricing. Charging times vary: Mazda’s smaller battery fills in 1hr 30min on a 7.4kW wallbox, Lexus in 2hr 45min, and Volvo exceeds 5 hours.

• Lexus NX: Best hybrid fallback efficiency at 48.9mpg.
• Mazda CX-60: Quickest charge, solid 42.3mpg overall.
• Volvo XC60: Powerful but thirstiest at 32.6mpg post-charge.

Driving Dynamics: Handling, Ride, and Refinement

Behind the wheel, priorities shift to chassis tuning. The Lexus NX strikes the optimal balance, offering sharp steering sharper than the Volvo yet compliant over bumps. It exhibits less fidget than Mazda and superior cornering poise. Mazda’s rear-biased setup delivers engaging handling true to brand heritage, but its transmission feels clunky during shifts, hindering overtakes.

Volvo prioritizes plush comfort with passive suspension (air springs optional on higher trims), yet it lags in agility compared to the Japanese rivals. Cabin noise control is excellent across the board, aided by premium audio systems like Mazda’s Bose setup.

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Luxury defines these SUVs. Mazda’s cabin impresses with high build quality, adjustable driving positions, and a quiet Bose system, though seats feel firmer than rivals. Lexus counters with superior passenger space, especially rear headroom and kneeroom, plus a wider, lower center rear seat for three adults. Volvo offers supportive seats and a serene environment but narrower boot access.

Boot volumes highlight Mazda’s lead: 570 liters expandable to 1,726 liters, surpassing Lexus (525/1,436 liters) and Volvo (468/1,395 liters). Seat-folding mechanisms are boot-mounted for ease, though Mazda’s load floor isn’t perfectly flat.

Safety Ratings and Technology Features

Safety is paramount. Volvo XC60 scores five stars from Euro NCAP (2018) with 97% adult occupant protection. Lexus NX achieves similar five-star status (2022) at 91% adult/87% child. Mazda CX-60 data was pending at test time but aligns with brand standards. Infotainment varies: Lexus tech impresses with intuitive interfaces, Mazda offers crisp displays, and Volvo emphasizes minimalism.

Pricing, Ownership, and Value Assessment

Entry prices reflect positioning: Mazda CX-60 at £49,520 offers strong value, undercutting Lexus NX (£59,700) and competing with Volvo. Road tax is £480 annually across the board, with low CO2 outputs (Mazda 33g/km, Lexus 25g/km). Running costs favor Lexus long-term due to efficiency.

• Best Value: Mazda CX-60 for boot space and power at lower price.
• Premium Pick: Lexus NX for driving purity and tech.
• Comfort King: Volvo XC60 for serene cruising.

Pros and Cons Summary

Final Rankings and Recommendations

The Lexus NX 450h+ claims victory with unmatched powertrain refinement, driving balance, and efficiency—cementing its class leadership. Mazda CX-60 secures second for practicality and value, challenging premium norms. Volvo XC60 trails but excels for safety-focused families. Choose based on priorities: NX for enthusiasts, CX-60 for haulers, XC60 for cruisers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which has the best fuel economy?

The Lexus NX leads with 48.9mpg in tests, especially as a fallback hybrid.

Is the Mazda CX-60 worth the premium price?

Yes, its boot space and performance rival pricier foes at £49,520.

How safe is the Volvo XC60?

Five-star NCAP with 97% adult protection (2018 test).

What’s the electric range for these PHEVs?

Around 39-43 miles claimed; real-world varies by conditions.

Which offers the smoothest ride?

Lexus NX balances sharpness and compliance best.