Aygo Vs Picanto: Best Used City Car Comparison And Verdict

MD
Written by
Integrated MA

Compact city cars like the Toyota Aygo and Kia Picanto offer unbeatable value for urban commuters seeking low running costs and easy maneuverability. Both models excel in tight parking spaces and heavy traffic, but differences in space, refinement, and driving feel set them apart on the used market. This analysis draws from real-world tests to determine the superior choice for budget-conscious buyers.

Market Pricing and Availability

Used Toyota Aygos start at around £4,000 for 2014 models with 80,000 miles, making them more accessible than rivals. Examples from 2017 with 50,000 miles are available from £5,000, reflecting the model’s long production run and high supply.

In contrast, Kia Picantos begin at £6,000 for 2017 versions with 70,000 miles. Higher entry prices stem from the model’s newer platform and stronger resale value, but both cars remain bargains under £12,000 for low-mileage specimens.

  • Aygo advantage: Lower upfront cost and abundant supply.
  • Picanto advantage: Better long-term value retention.

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Both cars rely on 1.0-litre three-cylinder petrol engines with similar outputs: Aygo at 71bhp and 93Nm, Picanto at 66bhp and 96Nm. Five-speed manuals and front-wheel drive are standard.

Acceleration favors the Picanto, hitting 0-60mph in 12.4 seconds versus the Aygo’s 13.2 seconds. In-gear pulls are stronger too, with the Picanto covering 30-50mph in fourth gear in 9.5 seconds compared to the Aygo’s sluggish 14.1 seconds.

Fuel economy is close, with test figures of 53.2mpg for the Aygo and 49.8mpg for the Picanto. CO2 emissions are 93g/km (Aygo) and 114g/km (Picanto), both attracting £140 annual tax. The Aygo’s longer gearing aids highway cruising, but the Picanto’s peppier response suits stop-start city driving better.

SpecToyota Aygo 1.0 VVT-I x-pressKia Picanto 1.0 Mpi ‘2’
Price (new)£12,630£11,075
Power/Torque71bhp/93Nm66bhp/96Nm
0-60mph13.2s12.4s
Top Speed99mph100mph
Test MPG53.249.8
CO2/Tax93g/km / £140114g/km / £140

Interior Comfort and Practicality

The Kia Picanto stands out for its more mature cabin design, using higher-quality materials and offering greater space. Rear passengers enjoy adult-friendly legroom, unlike the cramped Aygo bench suited only for short trips or bags.

Boot capacity follows suit: Picanto provides easier access via a wider lid and more volume, ideal for shopping or weekend getaways. Aygo’s stylish interior includes user-friendly infotainment, but black plastics dominate the Picanto without much flair.

Refinement edges to the Picanto, which is quieter at motorway speeds despite higher revs at 70mph. The Aygo feels brittle over bumps, lacking the Kia’s composed ride.

Driving Dynamics and Handling

The Aygo’s sharp steering delivers fun in twists, but its firm suspension transmits road harshness. Low-speed comfort is decent, yet it trails the Picanto’s balanced chassis.

Picanto prioritizes relaxation with stronger mid-range pull and a smoother ride, making it preferable for mixed urban-highway use. Neither thrills like a hot hatch, but the Picanto’s versatility shines.

  • Aygo: Nimble but jittery.
  • Picanto: Composed and quicker.

Equipment, Safety, and Reliability

Aygo often comes better equipped in entry trims, featuring air-con, cruise control, reversing camera, and infotainment earlier than Picanto equivalents. Options like metallic paint (£515) and smartphone integration (£200) add appeal.

Toyota’s legendary reliability is a highlight, with fewer reported issues over high mileage. Kia’s seven-year warranty (transferable on used buys) bolsters confidence, though long-term data favors Aygo slightly.

Safety is basic in both, with no advanced aids in tested models, but Picanto feels more substantial.

Ownership Costs and Running Expenses

Insurance groups are higher for Aygo due to its sportier image, potentially raising premiums. Parts and servicing are cheap for both, aided by Toyota and Kia dealer networks.

Picanto’s efficiency and tax parity keep costs low, while Aygo’s economy edge is marginal. Resale holds stronger for Kia, rewarding patient owners.

Pros and Cons Summary

Toyota AygoKia Picanto
ProsDistinctive looks
Reliable
Good infotainment
Spacious
Refined drive
Stronger performance
ConsCramped
Less comfortable
Higher insurance
Staid styling
Higher prices
Firmer entry models

Final Verdict: The Winner

The Kia Picanto emerges victorious for its superior space, refinement, and driving ease, outweighing the Aygo’s style and reliability. Ideal for families or longer trips, it offers broader appeal despite a £2,000 premium. Aygo suits solo urbanites prioritizing fun and low cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper to buy used: Aygo or Picanto?

Aygo starts at £4,000 vs Picanto’s £6,000, but Picanto holds value better.

Is the Toyota Aygo reliable?

Yes, Toyota’s reputation ensures excellent longevity with minimal issues.

Which has more boot space?

Picanto offers larger, more accessible storage for practicality.

Are they fuel efficient?

Both exceed 50mpg in tests, with Aygo slightly ahead.

Best for city parking?

Aygo’s sub-3.5m length gives a tiny edge, but both excel.

References

  1. Toyota Aygo vs Kia Picanto: a used cheap city car shootout — Auto Express. 2023. https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/toyota/aygo/104686/toyota-aygo-vs-kia-picanto-used-cheap-city-car-shootout
  2. Kia Picanto vs Toyota Aygo – which is best? — Motorpoint. 2023. https://www.motorpoint.co.uk/comparisons/kia-picanto-vs-toyota-aygo
‹›