2007-2011 Subaru Impreza Hatchback: Complete Buyer Guide

The third-generation Subaru Impreza marked a significant chapter in the automaker’s compact car lineup when it debuted at the 2007 New York Auto Show. This generation introduced buyers to a dual-bodystyle approach, offering both hatchback and sedan configurations starting in 2008, alongside high-performance turbocharged variants. The model remained in production through 2011, establishing itself as a practical compact option in an increasingly competitive segment. Understanding this generation’s strengths and weaknesses provides valuable insight for both prospective buyers and enthusiasts interested in affordable used compact vehicles.

Powertrain Variety and Performance Characteristics

The third-generation Impreza presented buyers with multiple engine choices depending on their geographic market. In European markets, Subaru offered two naturally aspirated Boxer gasoline engines that prioritized efficiency and economy. The smaller 1.5-liter unit produced 107 horsepower, while the larger 2.0-liter variant generated 148 horsepower. Neither engine inspired enthusiasm among drivers seeking spirited acceleration, particularly the underpowered 1.5-liter when navigating congested traffic conditions. The 2.0-liter demonstrated superior pulling power and overall responsiveness compared to its smaller counterpart, making it the preferable choice for European customers prioritizing practicality over pure performance.

Transmission options significantly influenced the driving experience. The five-speed manual transmission featured a particularly smooth and engaging shift action, providing a more satisfying experience than competitors in the compact car segment. Conversely, the four-speed automatic proved problematic—it felt technologically outdated, increased fuel consumption beyond the already modest standards, and struggled during aggressive acceleration scenarios.

For American customers, Subaru exclusively offered a 2.5-liter naturally aspirated engine producing 173 horsepower. This powerplant demonstrated superior characteristics compared to European variants, delivering better acceleration, reduced engine noise, and a more refined overall driving experience. In performance testing, this engine powered the 2011 model from zero to 60 mph in approximately 8.2 seconds with manual transmission, though automatic variants sacrificed some performance capability.

The high-performance lineup introduced the turbocharged WRX derivative, available with either 233 or 255 horsepower on premium S variants. These turbocharged engines transformed the driving character entirely, offering substantially more grunt and responsiveness for customers demanding sporting capability. Performance-oriented drivers particularly appreciated the distinctive engine note produced by these variants, which added an auditory dimension to the driving experience that complemented their enhanced power delivery.

A diesel engine arrived in 2009 specifically for European customers, promising approximately 48 miles per gallon—a significant improvement over gasoline alternatives. However, this diesel option lacked the refinement and smoothness expected in the compact car segment, making it less appealing despite its superior efficiency figures.

Fuel Economy and Operational Costs

Fuel consumption represented a notable consideration for prospective buyers evaluating the Impreza’s total cost of ownership. The 1.5-liter engine achieved approximately 34 miles per gallon combined, while the 2.0-liter improved this figure to around 37 miles per gallon. American customers with the 2.5-liter engine experienced lower efficiency, achieving 20 mpg city, 27 mpg highway, and 22 mpg combined with manual transmission. Automatic variants sacrificed one highway mile per gallon, delivering 26 mpg on highways instead.

Performance-oriented WRX variants naturally consumed significantly more fuel, averaging approximately 27 miles per gallon combined. These turbocharged models demanded premium fuel and provided higher performance capability, creating a distinct trade-off between driving dynamics and operational economy.

Interior Space and Cargo Practicality

The hatchback configuration provided practical cargo versatility typical of compact cars in this segment. Boot space measured 301 liters, placing the Impreza slightly behind direct competitors like the Citroën C4 (314 liters) and Hyundai i30 (340 liters). This meant that while the Impreza offered reasonable cargo capacity for groceries, luggage, and daily necessities, competing hatchbacks provided marginally more versatility for customers prioritizing maximum storage flexibility.

Interior design emphasized functionality over luxury. The dashboard and cabin environment felt straightforward and purposeful rather than cutting-edge or premium. Standard equipment varied by trim level but consistently included climate control, multiple airbags, power windows, and fog lamps across the lineup. The 2.0R trim added 16-inch alloy wheels, electronic stability control, and xenon headlights for improved night visibility. Higher 2.0RX variants incorporated cosmetic enhancements including front and rear spoilers, chromed exhaust outlets, and 17-inch alloy wheels, alongside interior amenities such as satellite navigation systems and sport-oriented seating.

Front and rear seating accommodated five occupants comfortably. Reviewers noted that the 2011 refresh improvements included expanded rear-seat legroom and reduced cabin noise levels, enhancing the overall passenger experience. The comfortable suspension tuning delivered one of the most refined rides available in the small car category, benefiting commuters and long-distance travelers alike.

Technology and Convenience Features

By contemporary standards, in-cabin technology in the third-generation Impreza represented baseline offerings without premium sophistication. Top-tier trim levels featured CD stereo systems with multichangers, DVD playback capability, and integrated satellite navigation. These technologies, standard in premium segments, represented optional luxuries in the compact car market of this era. The feature set prioritized essential convenience without excessive complexity.

Standard Equipment and Available Options

Every Impreza in this generation came equipped with all-wheel drive as standard, distinguishing it from many front-wheel-drive competitors. This all-wheel-drive system provided significant advantages in adverse weather conditions and on poor road surfaces. Power windows and fog lamps appeared across the lineup, alongside six airbags distributed throughout the cabin. Climate control functionality appeared as standard equipment, ensuring comfortable cabin temperatures regardless of external weather conditions.

Safety Performance and Crash Protection

The 2011 model year demonstrated competitive safety credentials for its segment. Government crash testing awarded the Impreza five stars for frontal impact protection and five stars for front occupant protection during side-impact collisions. Rear passenger side-impact protection received a four-star rating, representing solid performance. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an independent testing organization, awarded the Impreza its highest “Good” rating in both frontal-offset and side-impact crash tests, indicating performance equal to or exceeding many competitors in the compact car category.

Handling Dynamics and Driving Experience

The standard all-wheel-drive system fundamentally influenced how the Impreza responded to driver input across varying road conditions. This drivetrain configuration delivered responsive and balanced handling characteristics, making the vehicle enjoyable during both spirited drives and everyday commuting. The suspension geometry prioritized comfort without completely sacrificing cornering capability—a balanced approach suited to drivers seeking practical transportation with occasional recreational driving enjoyment.

WRX and WRX STI variants elevated driving dynamics substantially, featuring tuned suspension components, upgraded braking systems, and performance-oriented tire packages that transformed the vehicle into a genuinely thrilling platform for driving enthusiasts. These variants maintained exceptional all-wheel-drive capability across diverse weather conditions and surfaces, establishing a reputation for both fun-to-drive characteristics and winter weather competence.

Reliability Considerations and Potential Problem Areas

Reliability data from industry surveys suggested this generation deserved careful consideration. The 2011 model year—the generation’s final before major redesign—demonstrated average overall reliability according to Consumer Reports assessments. However, specific problem areas required attention from prospective buyers. Engine-related issues ranked worse than average, including major mechanical failures that could require substantial repairs. Paint and trim quality fell below segment averages, suggesting potential durability concerns with exterior finishes. Brake system problems emerged as particularly problematic, with ratings significantly worse than average across the generation.

Noise and leak issues appeared more frequently than expected in this segment, indicating potential seal and weatherstripping degradation over time. These problems typically manifested gradually, making regular inspections important for used vehicle assessment.

Market Positioning and Competitive Context

The third-generation Impreza occupied a specific market niche—buyers seeking all-wheel-drive capability in a compact package without premium pricing. Competitors like the Chevrolet Aveo and Cruze offered lower purchase prices and better fuel economy, but lacked all-wheel-drive advantages and comparable driving refinement. The Impreza’s distinctive positioning around all-wheel drive and responsive handling appealed to customers in regions experiencing variable weather conditions or those prioritizing winter weather capability over maximum fuel economy.

Base pricing for 2011 models started at $17,995 excluding destination fees, positioning the vehicle competitively within the compact car segment. Monthly fuel costs averaged approximately $153 based on contemporary fuel prices, representing moderate operational expenses for the segment.

Notable Design Changes and Refresh Updates

The generation’s tenure from 2007 through 2011 included a minor facelift in late 2009. This refresh introduced a redesigned grille insert as its most visible exterior change, though mechanical and interior modifications remained limited. The 2011 model year incorporated more substantial refinements including increased rear-seat legroom and improved cabin insulation for enhanced noise reduction and passenger comfort.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the 2007-2011 Impreza come with all-wheel drive as standard?

Yes, all-wheel drive appeared as standard equipment across every trim level and configuration throughout this generation, distinguishing it from many front-wheel-drive competitors in the compact segment.

What engine options are available for the 2007-2011 Impreza hatchback?

Engine options varied by market. European models received 1.5-liter (107 hp) and 2.0-liter (148 hp) naturally aspirated engines, while American customers received a 2.5-liter (173 hp) engine. Performance variants included turbocharged WRX versions with 233-255 horsepower, and a 2009-onward diesel option appeared in Europe.

How does fuel economy compare to competing compact hatchbacks?

The 2.0-liter achieves approximately 37 mpg combined while the 2.5-liter manages 22 mpg combined. This lags behind some competitors but reflects the all-wheel-drive system’s weight and complexity tradeoffs.

Is this generation known for reliability issues?

This generation demonstrates average overall reliability with notable problem areas in engine durability, brake system longevity, and paint quality. Prospective buyers should prioritize pre-purchase inspections focusing on these specific systems.

How much cargo space does the hatchback provide?

The hatchback configuration provides 301 liters of cargo space, placing it slightly behind direct competitors but offering adequate capacity for typical compact car needs.